every smith
  • MS: Max Smith's blog
  • History to the Defeated
  • every smith: independent creative consultants
  • Words: Max - a brief bio
  • Sites to see

Leamington Letters #123: Pushing the envelope

27/2/2017

9 Comments

 
Picture
Photo credit: Reuters
Wouldn’t it have been wonderful if, back in January, at the moment when Trump was raising his hand to take the oath of office, a Supreme Court justice or even Faye Dunaway had rushed down the steps of the Capitol and announced: ‘Sorry, there’s been a mistake’? Clinton won the popular vote by a couple of million, he or she would say. Trump is here under false pretences.
 
Last night, the Academy was quickly able to recognize, acknowledge and put right its mistake at a cost of a little embarrassment. Other, more important issues, are less easily rectified.
 
Southampton fans may point to their team’s disallowed goal at Wembley yesterday, a clearly erroneous decision by the linesman. But it is the Brexit referendum which is the clear parallel.
 
As a remainer and, yes, a remoaner also, it seems to me eminently sensible that there should be a second referendum when the results of the Tory negotiations are made clear, if they ever become so. This is not merely because my side lost, but because the subsequent machinations of the various political parties have made the 48% of those who voted without any effective representation on what is surely the overarching issue de nos jours. Merely a handful of Liberal Democrats, who were part of the coalition which approved the referendum, remain in the remain corner.
 
In our much vaunted parliamentary democracy, Labour and Tory are united in voting for Article 50 in the full knowledge of how this is being taken as a mandate for policies which had not been mentioned, unless specifically denied, during the referendum campaign.
 
And, reluctantly, I blame Corbyn.
 
The three-line whip which he imposed on his party, the majority of which are also in the remain camp, was an uncharacteristic decision by a man who is principled or nothing. His abrupt transformation into a Mandelsonian Machiavel, concerned with the minutiae of political wheeling and dealing in what we used to call smoke-filled rooms is not solely regrettable. He is no longer a man of principle, but a politician: exactly the reverse of why we voted him for in the first place.
 
Had he stood in the Commons and announced a free vote, he would have not only prevented the resignations of several members of the Shadow Cabinet and the unfortunate migraine of Dianne Abbott, but also applied moral pressure on May to allow her own MPs (the majority of whom are also remainers) similar freedom. We might even have seen our local Tory MP, Chris White – who is a remainer representing a constituency which voted to remain – casting his vote in accord with the will of his constituents.
 
Parliament would then be truly ‘representative’ of the people.
 
But it’s too late now. Too late even to apply moral pressure. Too late even for him to stick to his principles.
 
“These are my principles, and if you don’t like them, I have others.”
 
I despair.
 
Today from the everysmith vaults: I am listening to The 13 Most Beautiful: Songs for Andy Warhol’s Screen Tests by Dean & Britta. I have two versions: the album itself and a live show at the Y, Philadelphia recorded by those wonderful folk at nyctaper. You will not be surprised to hear that I prefer the show. But both are worthy of your close attention.

9 Comments
Jon
27/2/2017 09:55:18

Neat parallel. And absolutely right re Corbyn. I feel personally betrayed by that decision. The irony is that Labour's future depends on its pro-Europe stance. A democratic exercise (the referendum) has resulted in the disenfranchisement of millions of us.

Reply
Pete
27/2/2017 10:02:19

To borrow one of your baseball metaphors, a walk-off win in extra innings is a win. We lost the referendum and would have lost the parliamentary vote anyway. It was Catch 22 for Jez.

Reply
Ellie
27/2/2017 10:11:02

All the more reason to stick to principle. The 'politics' achieved nothing except to lose Copeland.

Reply
Thom
27/2/2017 12:09:16

Always regarded Dean and Britta as Yo La Tengo Lite but this Warhol stuff sounds good. Will buy the album.

Reply
Allan
27/2/2017 19:26:45

inclined to agree with you. Bizarrely, the party that was split over Europe is now united (in opposition despite being in government) and the party that was united is now divided. Corbyn, whom I also voted for and support, is responsible for this. Like you, I despair.

Reply
Parn
27/2/2017 20:01:00

Touché, Max! Still, many people think he's just submitting to "the will of the people" and therefore can win the next election.

Reply
(Notthat)Bob
1/3/2017 11:03:26

How fickle you are, Max. You were an early Corbynista - I admire you for that - but seem to have changed your mind. He remains the only hope for the party and the country.

Reply
Max
1/3/2017 11:17:37

I agree with your last statement. But I also believe that on this issue (which is not unimportant) he is fundamentally and strategically wrong. And see another 3 line whip in the Lords yesterday against a perfectly reasonable Labour peers' amendment.

Reply
Jon G
2/3/2017 07:45:20

Corbyn is driving Labour over the edge of a cliff which is bad news for democracy in this country. Another contest for the leadership is urgently needed but the potential contenders seem prepared to sit on their hands and watch. Never mind.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Max Smith

    European writer, radical, restaurateur and Red Sox fan. 70-something husband, father, step-father, grandfather and son. Resident in Warwick, England.

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Art
    Baseball
    Books
    Film
    Food + Drink
    French Letters
    Leamington Letters
    Media
    Music
    People
    Personal
    Politics
    Sport