every smith
  • MS: Max Smith's blog
  • History to the Defeated
  • every smith: independent creative consultants
  • Words: Max - a brief bio
  • Sites to see

Leamington Letters ≠38: from the Duke of York's HQ to the Duke of York's Theatre

19/1/2013

21 Comments

 
Picture
It is somehow appropriate that the Saatchi Gallery should host an exhibition of Soviet and Russian modern art. Set in the imposing space of the Duke of York’s HQ in Chelsea, the gallery established by one of the major beneficiaries of Thatcherism and global capitalism is currently showing two very different but contiguous exhibitions of work from the first three decades of Moscow-based, post-Stalinist modern art.

What is interesting is the paucity of ideas from those who looked to mimic the west, and the accomplishment of those who wished to engage with Stalinist and socialist (they are different) realism in a modern, political and creative manner.

Picture
So the highlights for me were the mocking works of the Soks Art movement, which draw on pop art and socialist realism, and the nostalgic socialist realist works of which the Meeting of Two Sculptures above, by Leonid Sokov, is a favourite, as Lenin peers at a faux Giacometti.

In a single piece, we see the clash of cultures, the struggle between what is permitted and what is forbidden, the synthesis of old and new left.

This is art. This, below, is an easy, cheap, advertising idea.
Picture
Well, ok. But to quote Lenin legitimately, it is one step forward, two steps back.

One understands why it might have been conceived, even executed. But one fails to understand why the image sits on a wall in a gallery in London. 

It's glib and it's facile, and it is a matter of concern that this kind of western icon has been appropriated by the new Russia and its non-conformist artists. 

It's a mystery why the curators of the Saatchi Gallery believe it worthy of our attention and their very expensive wall space, unless it is to celebrate the ways in which an ex-communist state can so easily be absorbed into our own business of art.

It is from one form of conforming to another.

We spent the morning at the Duke of York's HQ. That evening, we were at the Duke of York's Theatre to see The Judas Kiss, David Hare's play about Wilde.

It was always a good play. But now, in this revival, with Rupert Everett as Wilde and Freddie Fox as Bosie, it is something of a triumph.

In this script, and in this performance, one sees both sides of Wilde: a man who will not compromise his moral integrity, and a man who is hell-bent on self-destructive martyrdom.

In the second half, he is a shrunken figure, but a brave and determined figure, whose wit and intelligence remain despite knowledge of his imminent betrayal.

The theatre is old and cold; the noise of the underground reverberates regularly. But the play is profound and cathartic. I commend it to you.

Today's listening: Miss Sold from the Swaps. We all know that this is a great live band, but they can do it in the studio, too. 
21 Comments
CJ
20/1/2013 01:33:24

I'm surprised that your listening did not take you back to your Shostakovich archives, the soundtrack to those days: a Soviet artist's reply to just criticism, perhaps?

Reply
Max
21/1/2013 08:01:28

Ah yes, the 5th. They say that the applause at the end of its first performance was longer than the symphony itself. And given that the theme is the making of man, that must tell us something. Certainly more profound than anything on show at the Saatchi.

Reply
èarn123
20/1/2013 03:43:13

"it is a matter of concern that this kind of western icon has been appropriated by the new Russia and its non-conformist artists"
I think you're being too serious - they are just celebrating their liberation from Lenin's legacy of control freaks and commissars, and that they have survived the subsequent communist jihads.

Reply
Max
21/1/2013 08:05:58

You're probably right. I understand the need for celebration at surviving Stalinist and Leninist jihads, but do think that these were/are serious issues which needed/need to be addressed seriously. Also that the self-conscious mimicry of western pop is a refusal to recognise the current situation. See Pussy Riot.

Reply
Leon
21/1/2013 01:52:37

Max, I hesitate (as always) to take issue with you - but I have to say that I find The Meeting of Two Sculptures almost as banal and obvious as the rightly-derided Lenin /Coca Cola poster. There's rather more craft involved, I suppose, but art? It looks more like a superior kind of model-making to me!
Best - Léon

Reply
max
21/1/2013 08:09:17

Leon! I've been trying for two years to establish Not Dark yet as a forum for contrarians, and I finally have two (however hesitant) disagreements. For which, much thanks. Agree with you that it is probably less art and more craft, but I do think it is making a subtler and more important point, and doing it in a more accomplished manner. Would love to discuss this further ... xx

Reply
TonyD
21/1/2013 08:50:57

What you don't mention, and nor do your correspondents, is the painting you reproduce at the top. I think it's the best thing in the show. Genuinely 'nostalgic socialist realism', and a fine piece of painting. And I do agree that the mass cast of Lenin versus the Giacometti is an approximation of art, if not the real thing. Whatever that is.

Reply
Max
21/1/2013 09:31:27

True. Genuinely nostalgic. Genuinely socialist. Genuinely realist. And it's a good point that the Lenin is a mass casting as opposed to the one-off or limited edition giacomettis. It is genuinely popular art. Or was. Wasn't all bad in the good old days.

Reply
charlotte ford
22/1/2013 04:02:10

Thankyou for another stimulating blog ,Ken and myself enjoyed a decent argument over the course of yesterday re. a much excercised topic in this household; Conceptual Art,and started me on a very enjoyable look at the connections between Giacometti sculpture and influences he drew upon from the ancient world. The Coca cola /Lenin image, for me, is a good example of Conceptual Art , the 'art' is clearly taking second place to the 'concept' ,which is a crappy one anyway. But,I see the Sokov work as Conceptual Art too, rather than as a work of art. The concept is better ! But his effort to convey a faux Giacometti fails for me (and Ken) inasmuch as real Giacometti was concerned with form, and there is no form present in Sokov's representation of the elongated figure. Hope this long winded response makes some sense !!!

Reply
charlotte ford
22/1/2013 07:57:55

...except,have now to discover whether the Gaicomtti walking man looks wrong because it is Sukov's own reworking ,or because it is a cast of the true Giacometti ,but looks unfamiliar in juxtaposition with the figure of Lenin ?

Reply
Max
22/1/2013 08:52:17

Hi Charlotte and Ken

Hoped you guys might respond.

My understanding is that the Giacometti is a Sokov, and thus deliberately slightly awry, as is the Lenin. Otherwise, the 'concept' would work.

But, to refer back to your more generalist point, is this conceptual art?

I'm not sure I really understand the term in this context. All art, surely, is centred on and revolves around a concept. Which maybe an idea (Hurst etc) or a narrative (Michelangelo, Titian, Degas, Renoir). Or something which is both: Picasso, Matisse etc.

The word concept was appropriated by those of us in the advertising industry to give substance to what we did: a mixture of puns, image manipulation, wisecracks, etc. (léon,are u still with us?)

Isn't everything conceptual? And isn't conceptual art merely a description which forces us to focus on the idea rather than the execution?

I would rather not think of the Sokov as conceptual only because I think the the medium is the message, and the essayist the medium. Sokol cast theLenin and the Giacometti in different ways and using different technologies.

I like it. But then my way of seeing may work in a way which is appropriate for this way of working ...

Max
22/1/2013 08:55:01

Sorry, lots of typos in the above. Trust you can understand what I am striving to say ...

Reply
Charlotte and Ken
23/1/2013 04:28:18

Hello again Max,

Yes, the Giacometti had to be a Sokov really, for it to be a faux Giacometti, but it is so similar to Walking man, I was beginning to wonder!

Now, as Ken does not use the computer (he is profoundly dyslexic in a way that he has overcome in terms of ability to read, but putting his thoughts in writing is a frustrating struggle between a quck mind and a slow hand ) so he has asked me to write his thoughts on his behalf

He has hugely enjoyed the thought process your blog has given him. ''Max, I agree with your definition of the origins of conceptual art in terms of the advertising industry. I remember,when I was a young art student,how we were very interested in the hidden 'persuaders' etc, but we didn't seek to use any of those discoveries as at that time we were working from a deep interest in the creative unconsciousness.
Of course, there are many areas to explore, as this is a huge subject,but from my own limitations I find it so much easier to discuss these matters face to face.

With warmest wishes, Ken ''

Reply
charlotte ford
23/1/2013 06:12:02

Hello Max, I had to gather my thoughts; here goes. Yes. I agree with you that conceptual art is a term which forces us to focus on the idea,rather than the execution.
From there , yes, all art is a product of a concept , but the finished object may have become, depending on the artist, during the process of execution,more concerned with form or composition or other aesthetic ideas .
So the execution of the Sokov piece does work well as a concept conveyed through a form that is certainly more pleasing to my eye than that of the Lenin /Coke image.
There is a surfiet of (IMHO) truly hideous conceptual art at the moment, where the concept has not only subsumed the execution, but is so banal as to drive Ken and myself to an almost obsessive use of the term as a form of derision!
It is only through discussion that the opportunity arises whereupon we are able to reassess our ideas! Your blog has given us some sorely needed stimulus , hopfully what I have written makes sense.

All good wishes ,

Charlotte.

PS I know who that Leon is !! XXX

Reply
max
24/1/2013 01:05:00

No argument at all that there is a plethora of conceptual art around and most of it banal to say the least. But this is probably true of every art form at any given moment (music, literature, dance etc). So I am not criticising the concept of conceptual art, merely these particular examples.I have always believed with Auden - or was it Spender? - that the most important thing is to have something to say, and then to say it as well as one can.Too few conceptual artists have anything to say and fewer can do it with any skill. But there are some that can. Enjoying this conversation, but agree wholeheartedly that it would be even more rewarding face to face.

Reply
Tim H-C
23/1/2013 16:39:52

at the risk of pitching in on the "art" debate....a subject i`m woefully unqualified to discuss with any authority....isn`t the fact that, whilst probably being glib and facile, the coke (tm incorporated) piece is being exhibited precisely because it shows how quickly and deeply some of the worst aspects of western culture have been embraced by post soviet russian society including its art? Is it the juxtaposition of that particular soft drink logo with Lenin`s image that offends.....if it had been a campbells soup logo would that be less trite?......

Reply
max
24/1/2013 01:10:18

Thanks Tim (and for the comments on earlier posts - you clearly had more than a 'quiet 5 minutes'). I think you're right that the Lenin Coke serves to remind us how quickly the process of trivialisation and westernisation occurred, and it - and its hanging - are important in this respect. The show will be over by the time you and yours take over the gallery at the end of next month, but it's worth seeing. As are you - give me a call. xx

Reply
Max
24/1/2013 01:15:50

Just want to add, because it is going unremarked, that my oulipian half hour allowed for the blog meant that I said very little about The Judas Kiss. Coincidentally, or perhaps synchronistically, I read a piece about David Hare the day after writing, and he spoke of treating Wilde as an Irish revolutionary rather than a dandy. He also made the point, which I had intended to make, that not one of Wilde's celebrated aphorisms is present in the script, but his wit and intelligence most certainly is. It's a fine play, and very well performed. As Hare said, it is difficult to see where Everett ends and Wilde begins. Or was it the other way round?

Reply
Jimbo
28/1/2013 13:13:33

I think that Hare was mistaken. As the Turtle said "slow and steady win's the race". Much like capitalisym only that was a little unfair to poor people. If only that western Hare had listened to Comrade Touché Turtle.

If Carlsberg wrote blog comments, that would have made sense. Probably....

Reply
Martin
30/1/2013 01:41:37

I think I see a bit more fun in the Coca Cola advert than you did, Max. For me it's in the various parsings of 'It's the real thing'. Seems to be what the exhibition is about. How to deal with realism, that's the spectre.

Reply
max
6/2/2013 09:52:08

I think this is the perfect last word. It's about realism. Of course it is!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Max Smith

    European writer, radical, restaurateur and Red Sox fan. 70-something husband, father, step-father, grandfather and son. Resident in Warwick, England.

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Art
    Baseball
    Books
    Film
    Food + Drink
    French Letters
    Leamington Letters
    Media
    Music
    People
    Personal
    Politics
    Sport