every smith
  • MS: Max Smith's blog
  • History to the Defeated
  • every smith: independent creative consultants
  • Words: Max - a brief bio
  • Sites to see

Not Dark Yet #304: Two Jews, three opinions

3/7/2019

5 Comments

 
Is it anti-semitic for a non-Jew to tell a Jewish joke? The other night, I was told it is. And I was reminded of Jonathan Miller, all those years ago in Beyond the Fringe, who claimed that he was not really a Jew. “Just Jewish; not the whole hog, you understand”.
 
Context is all, and the context was a Labour Conversation in Leamington about anti-semitism. “What it is – and what it is not.” The latter is, of course, particularly relevant in the Labour Party currently, as the furore over Chris Williamson’s reinstatement and re-suspension dominates the BBC.
 
Our speaker was Richard Kuper, founding member of Jewish Voice for Labour and Jews for Justice for Palestine. He showed us a selection of cartoons which have been accused of being anti-semitic. In groups, we discussed each one, including the example from the New York Times, which prompted the newspaper to cease publishing cartoons and also this one, by the acerbic Gerald Scarfe, for which the proprietor of the Sunday Times, Rupert Murdoch, apologised, calling it “offensive”.
Picture
It isn’t. It is an attack on Netanyahu and, by extension, on the Israeli government policies. But, and this was the principal thrust of Richard’s presentation, it is not anti-Jew.
 
But many people think it is. Because many people conflate legitimate criticism of Zionism and the policies of the Israeli government with anti-semitism, even though more than 20% of Israeli citizens are not Jewish; many Jews are not Zionist; and the majority of Zionists are not Jewish at all but Christian fundamentalists. (You may believe, as I do, that there is an agenda to this wilful misapprehension, but that is a separate issue.)
 
Equally, when we were faced with a number of statements by various politicians, we found similar confusion, often arrived at by a considerable stretch of definitions.
 
For example: Alexandra Ocasio-Ortiz characterized Trump’s immigration policy as “fascist”, because it was building “concentration camps on our southern border”. This caused offence to the “Jewish community” on the basis that this was belittling the Jewish experience of concentration camps.
 
Of course, concentration camps were a British invention. Of course, there is a distinction between concentration camps and extermination camps. And of course, there is no such thing as a Jewish community. There are many Jewish communities, which differ one from another in class, in culture, in politics, in religion.
 
Anti-semitism exists and must be eradicated inside and outside the party. But it must be allowable to argue against the policies of the Israeli government. It must be legitimate to take exception to the Zionist ideology. And it must be permissible to disagree with someone who happens to be Jewish. I do frequently, not least because some of my best friends etcetera etcetera …
 
How do we reconcile all this? How do we distinguish anti-semitism from criticism of Israel?
 
It’s actually simple. To quote from the declaration of anti-semitic misconduct published by Jewish Voice for Labour and Free Speech on Israel:
 
To be clear: conduct is anti-Semitic only if it manifests ‘prejudice, hostility or hatred against Jews as Jews’.

Today from the everysmith vaults: The Fairports were in town and we forgot, so I've been making recompense by playing Unhalfbricking. Over and over. 
5 Comments
Allan
3/7/2019 13:15:33

The quote from JVL is all you need. We all know where these charges are coming from and it is nothing to do with antisemitism.

Ah, the fairports! Happy days. How many are left?

Reply
RichH
3/7/2019 14:51:05

I’d be interested to see the other
‘Cartoons’ on which you passed judgement. And isn’t 2 Jews, 3 opinions a Jewish joke? Asking for a friend.

Reply
Bill Campbell
4/7/2019 09:54:15

This sounds like a timely and interesting conversation, particularly in the light of the Chris Williamson and Jackie Walker affairs. You say that the 'agenda' behind the accusations is a separate issue. It isn't. It's actually the crux of the whole thing, as I am sure Richard Kuper would have pointed out.

Reply
John
4/7/2019 09:59:18

Even more timely in the light of the opinion poll this morning. Labour fourth with worst share of vote since polling began!

Reply
(Notthat)Bob
5/7/2019 11:05:51

Speaking of Chris Williamson, how is this - what he actually said - antisemitic?

"The party that stood up to racism is now being demonised as a racist, bigoted party.
I have got to day, I think our party's response has been party responsible for that because in my opinion ... we've backed off far too much, we have given too much ground, we've been too apologetic.
We've done more to address the scourge of antisemitism than any other party."

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

     Max Smith

    European writer, radical, restaurateur and Red Sox fan. 70-something husband, father, step-father. and grandfather. Resident in Warwick, England.

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Art
    Baseball
    Books
    Film
    Food + Drink
    French Letters
    Leamington Letters
    Media
    Music
    People
    Personal
    Politics
    Sport