every smith
  • MS: Max Smith's blog
  • History to the Defeated
  • every smith: independent creative consultants
  • Words: Max - a brief bio
  • Sites to see

Leamington Letters #122: Who cares if Brady supports Trump?

6/2/2017

11 Comments

 
Picture
As I write this, I am recovering from watching the Patriots come back from a 25 point deficit in the Super Bowl. So wretched was our first half performance that I nearly took to my bed when Lady Gaga appeared. I’m glad I didn’t. I saw the football equivalent of the Mothers’ Day Miracle at Fenway, back in 2007. Actually, greater and more memorable than that, because it took place in the super-charged atmosphere of the Super Bowl.
 
Until the game started at 23.30 UK time last night, however, I was following with relish the social media discussions about the political opinions of the principal characters in the club.
 
One might expect owner Robert Kraft and coach Bill Belichick, who actually resembles Steve Bannon both physically and in his controlling and manipulative approach to the world, to espouse Trumpist prejudices.

I did not, however, expect to read that MVP, GOAT and super-hero Tom Brady was not merely a supporter of Trump, but a friend and golfing buddy of the ‘so-called’ President.
 
How does this news affect my view of Brady? Does it devalue his achievements on the field?
 
For that matter, to what extent does Curt Schilling’s politics affect his chances of the Hall of Fame?

More importantly – or is it? - how does T.S. Eliot’s anti-semitism force us to re-think our admiration for his work as poet and seminal critic? Can we read Heidegger without thinking that this man joined the Nazi party? Or Sartre without remembering his early support for Stalin and later flirtation with Maoism?
 
Clearly, these cases are different from the sports examples: Eliot’s anti-semitism was part of his work; Heidegger’s thinking drove him (though not inexorably) to fascism; Sartre tried desperately to reconcile his existential commitment to individual freedom with a Marxist focus on society: he was only too aware of the contradictions.
 
But Brady? Schilling? Their politics have nothing to do with their on-field achievements. For the record, I voted for Schilling in the IBWAA HoF ballot on the basis that he might be a vile right-wing Republican shit, but he was our vile right-wing Republican shit and his record and bloodied sock justify inclusion in Cooperstown. And given the opportunity I would vote early and often for Brady too. He has overcome the egregious bias of Commissioner Roger Goodell, a four match ban and a 25 point deficit to cement his position in the stratosphere of the NFL.
 
And after a couple of hours sleep, right now I don’t care that he supports Trump.

As far as I’m concerned, he can do pretty much whatever he wants.
 
Today from the everysmith vaults: The great Michael Chapman is celebrating 50 years on the road with a new album, but I’m listening to the re-mastered Fully Qualified Survivor, originally from 1970.
 
Today from the everysmith shelves:  I read Rick Gekoski’s brilliant first novel, Darke, in proof form last year. I am now re-reading the published novel - it came out last Wednesday. Not aware of any significant changes, but a second reading is revealing new treasures and depths. I really cannot recommend this highly enough.

11 Comments
Matt
6/2/2017 10:28:13

Just wondering whether one of my favourite blogger's obsession with Boston sports should affect the way I think about his writing ...

Reply
Allan
6/2/2017 10:39:46

The one obvious example you don't mention is Wagner. Is he ok even though he is clearly a genius? Or does Hitler's admiration put him beyond the pale? Discuss.

Reply
Thom
6/2/2017 10:52:41

Unusual to read even an implied criticism of Sartre in these columns. You must be very sleep-deprived indeed, or coming to your senses at last. But only you could turn a post about a football match into a discussion of Eliot, sartre, Heidegger etc.

Reply
Helen
6/2/2017 14:02:16

I disagree. That we even know how this guy votes is ridiculous. He's just a footballer by the sound of it. I agree with your Chapman listening though. Good choice.

Reply
JonnyD
6/2/2017 14:35:29

No doubt he excels in his sport but this doesn't mean his opinions on the state of the nation are worthy of publicity never mind approval. Let him be what he is - a brilliant quarterback. Listen to him on that subject and nothing else.

Reply
(Notthat) Bob
6/2/2017 15:48:49

The re-mastered version is not a patch on the original vinyl. Too clean, too stereo, too ... bland.

Reply
PeterL
6/2/2017 14:42:13

What a great game though!

Reply
JoeL
6/2/2017 16:15:11

Though I completely lament the reason for your joyously exuberant celebration of the dark side victory in Super Bowl 50 plus 1, as usual I loved your post.

Reply
Malcom
6/2/2017 19:07:27

One example you haven't mentioned - and it's very topical - is the bizarre commission of Hockney to redesign the masthead of The Sun. And his even more bizarre claim that The Sun has always been his favorite newspaper.

Reply
Artlover
6/2/2017 21:31:32

Crap painter.

Reply
Rick Hough
6/4/2017 20:59:04

It always seemed odd that we act like athletes should show not just their on-field skils but also display the equilibrium, nuance and poise of Dag Hammarskjold. I look to my electrician to keep the current going only to where it ought.I don't need her or his insight into economic policy. The blending of faux craft ad under-cooked world view is best left to bartenders.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Max Smith

    European writer, radical, restaurateur and Red Sox fan. 70-something husband, father, step-father, grandfather and son. Resident in Warwick, England.

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Art
    Baseball
    Books
    Film
    Food + Drink
    French Letters
    Leamington Letters
    Media
    Music
    People
    Personal
    Politics
    Sport