every smith
  • MS: Max Smith's blog
  • History to the Defeated
  • every smith: independent creative consultants
  • Words: Max - a brief bio
  • Sites to see

Leamington Letters #19: A folie à deux?

15/3/2012

5 Comments

 

To be honest, I had intended to post this blog 36 hours or so ago. My topic was to be the cost of the Olympics (£24 billion was the figure that caught my interest) and I had planned a diversion or two into the funding of football, cricket and sport in general.

And then I had a sudden, atavistic memory of the introduction to a volume of poetry from 1932 or 33 which made the case for communism as the only hope for those who cared about the future of county cricket. Michael Roberts, I thought: New Country? New Signatures? And so I spent longer than the oulipian half hour I allow myself for Not Dark Yet, lost in Auden, and Spender, and Day Lewis. I never did track down the reference, and if anyone can find it for me, I would be pathetically grateful.

Anyway, by the time I had come out of my reverie, addressed some day-job deadlines and spent an hour or so with books (of figures), the world had moved on.

Rebekah Brooks and her horse trainer husband were under arrest, suspected of perverting the course of justice. Meanwhile, their best mate from Chipping Norton had legged it to the States and was presumably trying to re-negotiate the extradition treaty between our two great countries.

Judging by the gushing Mills & Boon speech-writing, Cameron and Obama are getting on spectacularly well.

Bush and Blair did also, I recall. In fact, it was Bush’s admiration of Blair which finally confirmed to the UK as a whole what many of us had believed from the start: that the war-mongering Blair was in the wrong party and probably in the wrong country, too. Reagan’s similar adoration of Thatcher was a statement of the obvious. They were the yin and yang of trickle-down.

But what are we to make of this current tryst? Is it an attraction of opposites? Or a folie à deux?

My online copy of USA Today characterizes Cameron as a “fetching British aristocrat”, and we all know that Americans have a thing for British royalty and aristocracy. I suppose they are of similar age and actually of similar background – because Cameron is not as high-born as USA Today would suggest, and Obama not as low-born as some might think.

But politically, surely, they have little in common. Especially their respective policies on the banking crisis, which are pretty much diametrically opposite. Even the presence of the egregious Osborne in the invading British forces won’t change Obama’s mind on this. After all, the US policy is actually working.

What I do hope is that, in between the basketball and the star-studded dinners, Cameron and Obama will finally bring to an end the Bush-Blair foreign policy of knee-jerk interventionist reactions. Iraq was a failure. Afghanistan is failing. Libya is a concern with reports of atrocities from the new government which appear to be at least as horrific as Gaddafi. And then there is Syria, Iran, North Korea ... 

I am not opposed to interventions - I've just been reading Auden's Spain after all. But I am opposed to reflex interventionism. 

What I hope these two – both intelligent men – will bring to world affairs is a great deal more thought and great deal less military action.

Today’s listening: The sharing option on Spotify at Wilde’s has been activated, so Facebook friends can see who has arrived in the building first. Recently, they will have noticed that Wilde’s is listening to Bob, and the Dead, and the Airplane. And this morning, it is New Riders of the Purple Sage. 


5 Comments
Rick Hough
15/3/2012 11:07:46

Hear-hear!
Two thoughts:
1) Modern Democrat Presidents are looking more and more like old fashioned centrist Republicans banking policy notwithstanding. If it wouldn't have cost him a whole lot of liberal-base campaign donations/votes, there's a decent chance Obama would've left banking regulation alone for another two years.

2) It's looking as though decreased intervention is the current mood, at least in the White House. It's tempting to believe Dick Chaney would've reinstituted conscription to get us into Syria (not to mention Bahrain, given that Shock & Awe was ostensibly staged to give the Saudis some grist for contemplation).

Reply
Max
18/3/2012 03:08:27

Rick, I think you're right about the centre of political gravity shifting right. It appears to be the case with both Cinton and Obama, and also with 'New' Labour over here. I am resisting the conclusion that the Left has lost the battle of ideas, but it worries me. Is it that there is emerging/has emerged a 'political' class from which all candidates are drawn and have only minor differences and few of substance. None of principle. No-one is challenging the received wisdom in any radical, fundamental manner. Lots happening here - will email you.

Reply
Hough
24/3/2012 08:16:41

Part of the question may be that we've not seen a Democratic president in a viable second term of office, during my lifetime, anyway. Clinton's second term was almost entirely absorbed by Monica until his lame duck period came into effect. It's tempting to wonder if any leader under a two term limit gets much more than the first year of post-inaugural honeymoon, then the first two years after reelection, in which two wage aggressive activism.
I tend to think, somewhere in his bosom, Obama is a pragmatic progressive who was presented with ICU level economic circumstances and may yet show his true cards.
On the overall, however, I think your notion of a 'political' class merits consideration. After all - these people tend to be remarkably resilient survivors because - just maybe- that's all they know how to do.

myers
15/3/2012 12:37:31

And of Afghanistan -
"a war begun for no wise purpose, carried on with a strange mixture of rashness and timidity, brought to a close after suffering and disaster, without much glory attached either to the government which directed, or the great body of troops which waged it. Not one benefit, political or military, was acquired with this war. Our eventual evacuation of the country resembled the retreat of an army defeated”. 2012 no 1843, the British army chaplain Rev G.R. Gleig

Reply
Max
18/3/2012 03:09:53

The reverend nails it. Thanks John.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Max Smith

    European writer, radical, restaurateur and Red Sox fan. 70-something husband, father, step-father, grandfather and son. Resident in Warwick, England.

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Art
    Baseball
    Books
    Film
    Food + Drink
    French Letters
    Leamington Letters
    Media
    Music
    People
    Personal
    Politics
    Sport