every smith
  • MS: Max Smith's blog
  • History to the Defeated
  • every smith: independent creative consultants
  • Words: Max - a brief bio
  • Sites to see

Not Dark Yet #274: A Man in Full?

20/5/2018

10 Comments

 
Picture
They are all there, lined up on the shelves, their multi-coloured paper backs leaping out from the more sombre company of Mailer, Roth, Updike, Irving and Thompson, their painted words shouting “Me! Me!”
 
Until my eye reaches the point where, chronologically, there should be The Bonfire of the Vanities, and it’s not there, and I remember that I abandoned it half-way through and loaned it to a friend and never bothered to ask for it back.
 
If one was reading English in the last couple of years of the ‘60s, Tom Wolfe was required reading. Not required by the syllabus you understand, but by one’s inner writer and critic. If one was also working on a student newspaper, then The New Journalism was there to be emulated, learned from, plagiarized. And if one was a young English person, listening to the Dead and regretting that there was no prospect of joining the Californian counter-culture, then The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test provided a degree of vicarious identification.
 
To a student of English literature, the formula was pretty obvious: third person narration, scene-by-scene narrative, dialogue (loads of it!) and references (loads of them!) to status symbols.
 
But what really marked out Wolfe’s prose was … well, the prose. He used devices such as bizarre punctuation and weird syntax, fancy typography and onomatopoeic neologisms.
 
The result was realist, writer and reader totally and equally immersed in character, narrative, life! His books – essays really – were non-fiction novels. And Wolfe was doing this knowingly, comparing the new journalism with the early realistic novel in England, and arguing that it was prompting precisely the same objections.
 
But there is a part of him, a part of every American writer, that knows the novel is the supreme literary achievement and that the holy grail of the Great American Novel is what he’s been put on earth to produce. (Mailer and Roth had the same aspiration and came closer.)
 
So in 1987 he publishes The Bonfire of the Vanities, and he loses me.
 
It’s full of false and fractured narratives. It’s full of brand names. It’s full of platitudes about race and capitalism. It’s focused on the media and media frenzy. It’s anti-feminist and misogynist. And he said that he wrote it with “a sense of wonder. I was saying [excitedly], 'Look at these people! Look at what they're doing! Look at that one! Look at that one!'”
 
That’s not novelistic. It’s not journalism. And it sure as hell ain’t literature.
 
But that’s ok. Not very much is. And I regret his death a great deal.
 
But not as much as I regret his hubris.
 
 
Today from the everysmith vaults: I’ve been listening to the Dead’s 1970 shows and, in so doing, fallen in love again with the New Riders of the Purple Sage. Currently it’s 1970-10-31 at SUNY Gym, Stony Brook, NY.

10 Comments
ChrisH
21/5/2018 08:49:28

True. It's an American phenomenon, this need to write the great American novel, this competitiveness with other writers. Wolfe took on his three stooges - Mailer, Updike and Irving, calling them 'bags of bones'. It mattered to him because he wanted to be seen as better or greater. It mattered to them because writing mattered to them. If you are saying a great journalist and lousy novelist, you're right.

Reply
James
21/5/2018 08:51:06

He never took on Bellow, though.

Reply
Mike
21/5/2018 12:31:29

To be fair, he only picked fights with those who picked fights with him. I think Mailer and Updike were genuinely concerned about the way he was trying to move American ‘literature’. Mailer was impressed by his style. And he chose Mailer for inclusion in The New Journalism. But when he turned against Mailer, he just sounded stupid.

Reply
James
21/5/2018 15:12:42

And Saul Bellow was above it all.

Allan
22/5/2018 08:59:16

The better books on the "masters of the universe" are by Michael Lewis, and they are new journalism. They read like thrillers, but are packed with facts which are stranger than Wolfe's fiction.

Reply
Max
22/5/2018 09:02:10

Yes, and better written.

Reply
Ellie
22/5/2018 09:13:18

Max, did you read the original Dickens-style serialisation in Rolling Stone? McCoy was a writer not a bond trader. The novel ended up bigger, sprawling, and not as good as the original. But that's the time. It was in ths sense and ever other a product of the 80s.

Reply
Max
22/5/2018 10:45:56

Yes, I remember it and - in that short serial form with a writer as protagonist - enjoyed it. I've lost all my RS from that period over many moves, but would be interested in re-reading and comparing and contrasting with the blockbuster novel. It must be available somewhere - the RS archives?

Reply
CJ
24/5/2018 12:15:24

Where’s your Bob Birthday Blog?

Reply
Jerry link
10/5/2019 03:12:06

Thanks for posting this Max!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Max Smith

    European writer, radical, restaurateur and Red Sox fan. 70-something husband, father, step-father, grandfather and son. Resident in Leamington Spa, England.

    Picture
    Picture

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Art
    Baseball
    Books
    Film
    Food + Drink
    French Letters
    Leamington Letters
    Media
    Music
    People
    Personal
    Politics
    Sport